Review





Similar Products

93
Addgene inc joan massague
Joan Massague, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/smad6/pm41760544-200-45-49?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
joan massague - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc cs2 smad6
(A, B) AlphaFold3 structural predictions of MH1 domains. The β-hairpin region is shown in yellow. Remaining MH1 is shown in blue. (A) Smad3 MH1 domain showing DNA-binding region and predicted interaction. (B) Dad, <t>Smad6,</t> and Smad7 MH1 domains. (C) Representative wings from females expressing indicated construct in wing primordium. The scale bar represents 1 mm. (D, E) Transgenic control ( TwitGFP , OK371-Gal4/+ ) compared with OK371-Gal4 –driven overexpression of UAS-Dad , UAS-Smad6 , UAS-Smad7L , and UAS-Smad7S . (D) Motor neurons in ventral nerve cord triple-labeled for Elav (blue), TwitGFP (green), and pMad (red). The scale bar represents 20 microns. (E) Quantification of pMad and TwitGFP intensity normalized to the genetic background control. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Each dot represents mean data from motor neurons of one CNS. Statistical comparisons were performed using Dunn’s test with the Bonferroni correction. **** P < 0.0001, ** P < 0.01. Number of brains analyzed for pMad in the order shown in the graph: 52, 24, 25, 20, and 28. Number of brains analyzed for TwitGFP in the order shown in the graph: 53, 27, 22, 19, and 26.
Cs2 Smad6, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/smad6/pmc12948492-2-0-15?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cs2 smad6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Servicebio Inc smad6
Bioinformatics gene expression and clinical prognosis analysis of the main target proteins of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Part (A) presents the bioinformatics gene expression results for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), <t>Smad6</t> (g), and Smad9 (h) proteins, Part (B) shows the simple heatmap integration of the gene expression results. Part (C) shows the clinical prognosis analysis of the gene expression of TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h). A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.
Smad6, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/smad6/pmc12541422-91-10-21?v=Servicebio+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
smad6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals smad6
Bioinformatics gene expression and clinical prognosis analysis of the main target proteins of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Part (A) presents the bioinformatics gene expression results for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), <t>Smad6</t> (g), and Smad9 (h) proteins, Part (B) shows the simple heatmap integration of the gene expression results. Part (C) shows the clinical prognosis analysis of the gene expression of TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h). A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.
Smad6, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/smad6/pmc10265973__pnas__2221742120__sapp-69-81-82?v=Novus+Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
smad6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Sophia Genetics cryptic splice donor sites downstream smad6 exon 1
Bioinformatics gene expression and clinical prognosis analysis of the main target proteins of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Part (A) presents the bioinformatics gene expression results for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), <t>Smad6</t> (g), and Smad9 (h) proteins, Part (B) shows the simple heatmap integration of the gene expression results. Part (C) shows the clinical prognosis analysis of the gene expression of TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h). A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.
Cryptic Splice Donor Sites Downstream Smad6 Exon 1, supplied by Sophia Genetics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/smad6/pmc10982635__jmg___2023___109151supp001-2-152-160?v=Sophia+Genetics
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cryptic splice donor sites downstream smad6 exon 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Santa Cruz Biotechnology smad6-7 sc-7004
Bioinformatics gene expression and clinical prognosis analysis of the main target proteins of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Part (A) presents the bioinformatics gene expression results for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), <t>Smad6</t> (g), and Smad9 (h) proteins, Part (B) shows the simple heatmap integration of the gene expression results. Part (C) shows the clinical prognosis analysis of the gene expression of TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h). A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.
Smad6 7 Sc 7004, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/smad6/pmc11940460-46-0-2?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
smad6-7 sc-7004 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals smad6 nb100 56440
FTO knockdown has a limited effect on mRNA translation. (A) Fold change in translation efficiency upon FTO knockdown in MDA‐MB‐231 cells is displayed, color coded by FDR. Significantly regulated genes above threshold are indicated by gene symbol. (B) RT‐qPCR analysis of DICER mRNA expression in MDA‐MB‐231 cells with FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). (C) Immunoblots showing no change in DICER protein expression upon knockdown of FTO (shFTO1 or shFTO2) in MDA‐MB‐231 versus scrambled control (SCR). β‐Actin was used as loading control. Quantification is shown on the right. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). (D) RT‐qPCR analysis of COL1A1 and <t>SMAD6</t> mRNA expression in MDA‐MB‐231 upon FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates). (E) Immunoblot analysis of COL1A1, SMAD6, and DICER protein expression in MDA‐MB‐231 upon FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control, and β‐Actin as loading control. 5 days and 20 days refer to days in cell culture after transduction with shRNA retroviral vector. (F) Subsequence abundance analysis of codons at the +15 position relative to the ribosome protected fragment (RPF) 5′‐end. All transcripts in the coding frame are considered for this analysis. No significant enrichment or depletion of codons can be seen, indicating no obvious shortages of amino acids causing ribosome stalls/halts.
Smad6 Nb100 56440, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/smad6/pmc12103066-200-47-49?v=Novus+Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
smad6 nb100 56440 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A, B) AlphaFold3 structural predictions of MH1 domains. The β-hairpin region is shown in yellow. Remaining MH1 is shown in blue. (A) Smad3 MH1 domain showing DNA-binding region and predicted interaction. (B) Dad, Smad6, and Smad7 MH1 domains. (C) Representative wings from females expressing indicated construct in wing primordium. The scale bar represents 1 mm. (D, E) Transgenic control ( TwitGFP , OK371-Gal4/+ ) compared with OK371-Gal4 –driven overexpression of UAS-Dad , UAS-Smad6 , UAS-Smad7L , and UAS-Smad7S . (D) Motor neurons in ventral nerve cord triple-labeled for Elav (blue), TwitGFP (green), and pMad (red). The scale bar represents 20 microns. (E) Quantification of pMad and TwitGFP intensity normalized to the genetic background control. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Each dot represents mean data from motor neurons of one CNS. Statistical comparisons were performed using Dunn’s test with the Bonferroni correction. **** P < 0.0001, ** P < 0.01. Number of brains analyzed for pMad in the order shown in the graph: 52, 24, 25, 20, and 28. Number of brains analyzed for TwitGFP in the order shown in the graph: 53, 27, 22, 19, and 26.

Journal: Life Science Alliance

Article Title: Tissue-specific I-Smad mechanisms revealed by structure–function analysis in Drosophila

doi: 10.26508/lsa.202503445

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A, B) AlphaFold3 structural predictions of MH1 domains. The β-hairpin region is shown in yellow. Remaining MH1 is shown in blue. (A) Smad3 MH1 domain showing DNA-binding region and predicted interaction. (B) Dad, Smad6, and Smad7 MH1 domains. (C) Representative wings from females expressing indicated construct in wing primordium. The scale bar represents 1 mm. (D, E) Transgenic control ( TwitGFP , OK371-Gal4/+ ) compared with OK371-Gal4 –driven overexpression of UAS-Dad , UAS-Smad6 , UAS-Smad7L , and UAS-Smad7S . (D) Motor neurons in ventral nerve cord triple-labeled for Elav (blue), TwitGFP (green), and pMad (red). The scale bar represents 20 microns. (E) Quantification of pMad and TwitGFP intensity normalized to the genetic background control. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Each dot represents mean data from motor neurons of one CNS. Statistical comparisons were performed using Dunn’s test with the Bonferroni correction. **** P < 0.0001, ** P < 0.01. Number of brains analyzed for pMad in the order shown in the graph: 52, 24, 25, 20, and 28. Number of brains analyzed for TwitGFP in the order shown in the graph: 53, 27, 22, 19, and 26.

Article Snippet: CS2 Smad6 , N/A , CS2 Smad6 was a gift from Joan Massague (plasmid #14960; https://n2t.net/addgene:14960 ; RRID:Addgene_14960; Addgene) ( ) , Source of Smad6 CDS.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Expressing, Construct, Transgenic Assay, Control, Over Expression, Labeling

Bioinformatics gene expression and clinical prognosis analysis of the main target proteins of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Part (A) presents the bioinformatics gene expression results for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h) proteins, Part (B) shows the simple heatmap integration of the gene expression results. Part (C) shows the clinical prognosis analysis of the gene expression of TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h). A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.

Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

Article Title: Lathyrol inhibits the proliferation of Renca cells by altering expression of TGF-β/Smad pathway components and subsequently affecting the cell cycle

doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1629962

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bioinformatics gene expression and clinical prognosis analysis of the main target proteins of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Part (A) presents the bioinformatics gene expression results for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h) proteins, Part (B) shows the simple heatmap integration of the gene expression results. Part (C) shows the clinical prognosis analysis of the gene expression of TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad1 (c), Smad2 (d), Smad3 (e), Smad4 (f), Smad6 (g), and Smad9 (h). A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.

Article Snippet: In vitro antibodies included the following: TGF-β1, TGF-βR1, PCNA, Ki67, Smad6, Smad9, CDK6, cyclin A1, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, and P16 (Servicebio Co., Ltd.) and Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4 (Wuhan ProteinTech Co.).

Techniques: Gene Expression, IF-P

Experimental analysis of the effects of lathyrol on the expression of TGF-β/Smad pathway proteins and mRNA in Renca cells. Part (A) presents the results of the detection of TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1 protein expression, which was determined by WB. (a) represents the WB band, while b and c constitute the statistical analysis. Part (B) displays the results of Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4 protein expression, using an experimental approach identical to that in (A) a indicates the WB band, and (b, c), and d represent the statistical analysis. Part (C) shows the detection results of smad6 protein expression, where the experimental method is the ICC. a is the result of low magnification, b at high magnification, and c and d show the statistical analysis of the AOD value. Part (D) presents the results obtained for Smad9 protein expression, with the experimental method and parts (a–c), and d being the same as those in (C) Part (E) shows the mRNA expression results for the TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad2 (c), Smad3 (d), Smad4 (e), Smad6 (f), and Smad9 (g) proteins in Renca cells. A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.

Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

Article Title: Lathyrol inhibits the proliferation of Renca cells by altering expression of TGF-β/Smad pathway components and subsequently affecting the cell cycle

doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1629962

Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental analysis of the effects of lathyrol on the expression of TGF-β/Smad pathway proteins and mRNA in Renca cells. Part (A) presents the results of the detection of TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1 protein expression, which was determined by WB. (a) represents the WB band, while b and c constitute the statistical analysis. Part (B) displays the results of Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4 protein expression, using an experimental approach identical to that in (A) a indicates the WB band, and (b, c), and d represent the statistical analysis. Part (C) shows the detection results of smad6 protein expression, where the experimental method is the ICC. a is the result of low magnification, b at high magnification, and c and d show the statistical analysis of the AOD value. Part (D) presents the results obtained for Smad9 protein expression, with the experimental method and parts (a–c), and d being the same as those in (C) Part (E) shows the mRNA expression results for the TGF-β1 (s), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad2 (c), Smad3 (d), Smad4 (e), Smad6 (f), and Smad9 (g) proteins in Renca cells. A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.

Article Snippet: In vitro antibodies included the following: TGF-β1, TGF-βR1, PCNA, Ki67, Smad6, Smad9, CDK6, cyclin A1, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, and P16 (Servicebio Co., Ltd.) and Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4 (Wuhan ProteinTech Co.).

Techniques: Expressing, IF-P

Part (A) shows the results of the detection of TGF-β1 protein expression using IHC. a represents the results at low magnification, b represents the results at high magnification, and c and d represent the statistical analysis of the AOD values. Part (B) shows the detection results of TGF-βR1 protein expression, using the same experimental method and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (C) shows the detection results obtained for Smad2 + 3 protein expression, using the same experimental methods and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (D) shows the detection results obtained for Smad6 protein expression, using the same experimental method and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (E) shows the detection results determined for E protein expression, using the same experimental methods and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (F) shows the WB experimental results, in which a shows the WB band, and b and c show the corresponding statistical analysis. Part (G) shows the mRNA expression results obtained for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad2 (c), Smad3 (d), Smad4 (e), Smad6 (f), and Smad9 (g) proteins in Renca cells. A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.

Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

Article Title: Lathyrol inhibits the proliferation of Renca cells by altering expression of TGF-β/Smad pathway components and subsequently affecting the cell cycle

doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1629962

Figure Lengend Snippet: Part (A) shows the results of the detection of TGF-β1 protein expression using IHC. a represents the results at low magnification, b represents the results at high magnification, and c and d represent the statistical analysis of the AOD values. Part (B) shows the detection results of TGF-βR1 protein expression, using the same experimental method and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (C) shows the detection results obtained for Smad2 + 3 protein expression, using the same experimental methods and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (D) shows the detection results obtained for Smad6 protein expression, using the same experimental method and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (E) shows the detection results determined for E protein expression, using the same experimental methods and a, b, c, and d as in (A) Part (F) shows the WB experimental results, in which a shows the WB band, and b and c show the corresponding statistical analysis. Part (G) shows the mRNA expression results obtained for the TGF-β1 (a), TGF-βR1 (b), Smad2 (c), Smad3 (d), Smad4 (e), Smad6 (f), and Smad9 (g) proteins in Renca cells. A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, or *** P < 0.001; alternatively, a difference is considered not significant (ns) if P > 0.05.

Article Snippet: In vitro antibodies included the following: TGF-β1, TGF-βR1, PCNA, Ki67, Smad6, Smad9, CDK6, cyclin A1, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, and P16 (Servicebio Co., Ltd.) and Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4 (Wuhan ProteinTech Co.).

Techniques: Expressing, IF-P

FTO knockdown has a limited effect on mRNA translation. (A) Fold change in translation efficiency upon FTO knockdown in MDA‐MB‐231 cells is displayed, color coded by FDR. Significantly regulated genes above threshold are indicated by gene symbol. (B) RT‐qPCR analysis of DICER mRNA expression in MDA‐MB‐231 cells with FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). (C) Immunoblots showing no change in DICER protein expression upon knockdown of FTO (shFTO1 or shFTO2) in MDA‐MB‐231 versus scrambled control (SCR). β‐Actin was used as loading control. Quantification is shown on the right. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). (D) RT‐qPCR analysis of COL1A1 and SMAD6 mRNA expression in MDA‐MB‐231 upon FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates). (E) Immunoblot analysis of COL1A1, SMAD6, and DICER protein expression in MDA‐MB‐231 upon FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control, and β‐Actin as loading control. 5 days and 20 days refer to days in cell culture after transduction with shRNA retroviral vector. (F) Subsequence abundance analysis of codons at the +15 position relative to the ribosome protected fragment (RPF) 5′‐end. All transcripts in the coding frame are considered for this analysis. No significant enrichment or depletion of codons can be seen, indicating no obvious shortages of amino acids causing ribosome stalls/halts.

Journal: The Febs Journal

Article Title: The m6A demethylase FTO promotes C/ EBPβ ‐ LIP translation to perform oncogenic functions in breast cancer cells

doi: 10.1111/febs.70033

Figure Lengend Snippet: FTO knockdown has a limited effect on mRNA translation. (A) Fold change in translation efficiency upon FTO knockdown in MDA‐MB‐231 cells is displayed, color coded by FDR. Significantly regulated genes above threshold are indicated by gene symbol. (B) RT‐qPCR analysis of DICER mRNA expression in MDA‐MB‐231 cells with FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). (C) Immunoblots showing no change in DICER protein expression upon knockdown of FTO (shFTO1 or shFTO2) in MDA‐MB‐231 versus scrambled control (SCR). β‐Actin was used as loading control. Quantification is shown on the right. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SEM, n = 3 biological replicates). (D) RT‐qPCR analysis of COL1A1 and SMAD6 mRNA expression in MDA‐MB‐231 upon FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control. Significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test (mean ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates). (E) Immunoblot analysis of COL1A1, SMAD6, and DICER protein expression in MDA‐MB‐231 upon FTO knockdown (shFTO1 or shFTO2) versus shRNA‐scrambled (scr) control, and β‐Actin as loading control. 5 days and 20 days refer to days in cell culture after transduction with shRNA retroviral vector. (F) Subsequence abundance analysis of codons at the +15 position relative to the ribosome protected fragment (RPF) 5′‐end. All transcripts in the coding frame are considered for this analysis. No significant enrichment or depletion of codons can be seen, indicating no obvious shortages of amino acids causing ribosome stalls/halts.

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used for detection: FTO: NB110‐60935, Novus Biologicals, Abingdon, UK (1:1666); β‐Actin: 691001, MP Bio, Heerlen, The Netherlands (1:5000); C/EBPβ: ab32358, Abcam, Cambridge, UK (1:1000); WTAP: #56501 (1:1000), Cell Signaling Technology, Leiden, The Netherlands; COL1A1: #72026 (1:1000), Cell Signaling Technology, Leiden, The Netherlands; SMAD6: NB100‐56440, Novus Biologicals, Abingdon, UK (1:1000), FLAG‐M2: F‐3165, Sigma Aldrich, Merck, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1:1000).

Techniques: Knockdown, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, shRNA, Control, Western Blot, Cell Culture, Transduction, Retroviral, Plasmid Preparation